It's not very convenient as is

Thank you Alexander, you have described what I couldn't.

This currently does NOT replicate Google Reader functionality.

Old Reader: Subscriptions not in a folder are in a separate folder, on the same level as folders. A two-tier system.

Google Reader: Subscriptions are a "superfolder" that contains both unclassified subscriptions and folders. Basically, a three-tier tree.

Why is it important? I need my folders sitting between feeds in a big list. Some feeds are logical to combine is a folder, some not; still, there's a need to order them all.

Consider unclassified feeds as singleton folders. It then makes sense to intermix them and folders in a single list.

It already does this, doesn't it?

I think what I am looking for is sub folders under "SUBSCRIPTIONS" (or anywhere for that matter).

Oh, I just added a new feed, and TOR placed it under "Subscriptions" -- which is the area in the sidebar that I think you were referring to? Yeah, that's a folder, haha. So I guess everything must be filed one way or another.

That's so weird... (Or maybe I'm just not understanding what you're looking for? Arranging folders in a certain order via drag-and-drop?)

I tried moving a single feed all over the place within the sidebar, and I couldn't get it to go anywhere that wasn't a folder. If you drag it all the way to the bottom, a new folder is created for it. :P

Hi Kristan, Nope, still not allowing me to move a folder to the top of the feeds like I can with GR. As for moving your feeds from a folder to no folder, try dragging it to the top of the list near "SUBSCRIPTIONS" maybe?

Hm, maybe try again? I was able to rearrange my folders to my liking.

(I could not, however, figure out how to pull a feed out from a folder once it was inside one... Does every feed HAVE to be inside a folder? If so, why?)