Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hope for a quick solution here. This feature would bring TheOldReader right up to Google Reader's standard. There's currently no way to distinguish between read/unread items without selecting the feed again.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 116 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Totally agree. There's currently no way to differentiate between what's been read and what's still unread, other than to click the RSS feed again. I've found this to be the only major problem with TheOldReader.

    In every other respect, great job replacing Google Reader! Keep up the good work.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base